Jul 042010
Mar 122010

It is a rare opportunity when I find myself to the left of National Public Radio.  But sometimes it happens.

A blog reader alerts me to this NPR story, which says:

economists frown on what they call “Pigovian taxes,” which are designed not only to raise revenue but put to governments in the position of trying to influence how people shop or behave.

I don’t think economists are unanimous about this issue, but I believe most economists favor Pigovian taxes.

Moreover, the NPR story confuses Pigovian taxes with sin taxes.  Pigovian taxes try to correct for negative externalities–that is, the adverse effects of certain behavior on bystanders.  Sin taxes try to correct for behavior that some social planner deems as not sufficiently virtuous.

Click here for previous blog post on sin taxes.

Mar 012010

Thomas Friedman reports:

[Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican,] proposes “putting a price on carbon,” starting with a very focused carbon tax, as opposed to an economywide cap-and-trade system, so as to spur both consumers and industries to invest in and buy new clean energy products.

Dec 302009

Brookings economist Ted Gayer opines.

Brad DeLong and Paul Krugman attack.

Ted responds.

Dec 232009

From the ever sensible David Wessel.

© 2011 Random Observations for Students of Economics Random Observations for Students of Economics